The Epistemic Beliefs of Fourth Graders about the Verification of Second-Hand Knowledge and Its Knowledge Sources
Abstract
Only little is known about the epistemic beliefs of elementary school children. In this exploratory study, semistructured interviews were used to solicit epistemic beliefs of fourth grade students (n = 98; mean age = 10 years, 4 months) about the verification of second-hand knowledge. The data analysis was based on the Qualitative Content Analysis (Mayring, 2001), supported with Atlas.ti software, and yielded a high in interrater reliability (Cohen, 1960; κ = 0.94). In fourth grade students, a complex system of beliefs was identified about strategies of second-hand knowledge verification (independent strategies n = 8; dependent strategies n = 3), knowledge sources (human sources n = 4; non-human n = 4), and different source selection criteria (n = 8). Moreover, some students (n = 10) mentioned a cognitive process that they would employ to identify the best possible sources for the processes of knowledge verification, similar to following a decision tree. The discussion explores meaning of the identified multi-faceted and partially meta-cognitive nature of belief systems for the conceptualization of the developmental, dimensional, and situational frameworks as they exist currently.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jehd.v6n1a2
Abstract
Only little is known about the epistemic beliefs of elementary school children. In this exploratory study, semistructured interviews were used to solicit epistemic beliefs of fourth grade students (n = 98; mean age = 10 years, 4 months) about the verification of second-hand knowledge. The data analysis was based on the Qualitative Content Analysis (Mayring, 2001), supported with Atlas.ti software, and yielded a high in interrater reliability (Cohen, 1960; κ = 0.94). In fourth grade students, a complex system of beliefs was identified about strategies of second-hand knowledge verification (independent strategies n = 8; dependent strategies n = 3), knowledge sources (human sources n = 4; non-human n = 4), and different source selection criteria (n = 8). Moreover, some students (n = 10) mentioned a cognitive process that they would employ to identify the best possible sources for the processes of knowledge verification, similar to following a decision tree. The discussion explores meaning of the identified multi-faceted and partially meta-cognitive nature of belief systems for the conceptualization of the developmental, dimensional, and situational frameworks as they exist currently.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jehd.v6n1a2
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
Today | 1307 |
Yesterday | 1970 |
This Month | 42111 |
Last Month | 72673 |
All Days | 2754112 |
Online | 197 |